脚注
黃進興,〈理學、考據學與政治:以《大學》改本的發展為例證〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》60.4(1989):889-916。
Chin-shing Huang, “Neo-Confucianism, Textual Criticism, and Politics: the Development of the Revised Editions of the ‘Ta-hsüeh’ as an Example,” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 60.4 (1989): 889-916.
参考文献
黃進興
1989 〈理學、考據學與政治:以《大學》改本的發展為例證〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》60.4:889-916。
Huang, Chin-shing
1989 “Neo-Confucianism, Textual Criticism, and Politics: the Development of the Revised Editions of the ‘Ta-hsüeh’ as an Example.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 60.4: 889-916.
黃進興. (1989). 理學、考據學與政治:以《大學》改本的發展為例證. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, 60(4), 889-916.
Huang, Chin-shing. (1989). Neo-Confucianism, Textual Criticism, and Politics: the Development of the Revised Editions of the “Ta-hsüeh” as an Example. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 60(4), 889-916.
黃進興. “理學、考據學與政治:以《大學》改本的發展為例證.” 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 60, no. 4 (1989): 889-916.
Huang, Chin-shing. “Neo-Confucianism, Textual Criticism, and Politics: the Development of the Revised Editions of the ‘Ta-hsüeh’ as an Example.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 60, no. 4 (1989): 889-916.
黃進興. “理學、考據學與政治:以《大學》改本的發展為例證.” 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, vol. 60, no. 4, 1989, pp. 889-916.
Huang, Chin-shing. “Neo-Confucianism, Textual Criticism, and Politics: the Development of the Revised Editions of the ‘Ta-hsüeh’ as an Example.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, vol. 60, no. 4, 1989, pp. 889-916.