Main content
menu
English

Journal for Legal History Studies

Browse About Submission Info How to Subscribe

Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795)

  • Author:

    Lee, Dian-Jung

  • Page Number:

    26:111-144

  • Date:

    2014/12

  • Cite Download

Abstract

In the Ming Dynasty, “bare stick” meant “rogue” and cheater, but the meaning of “bare stick” gradually was be complicated in Qing. Recently academics presented high interest on “bare stick legislation” including of the developing history about the ordinance. However, researchers seldom notice “the Manchu feature” resulted from “bare stick legislation”. First of all, the making of “bare stick legislation” in Ming was used to punish the servants who were taken by the noblemen,but it was aimed the servants of Manchu Eight Banners in next dynasty. Furthermore, “bare stick legislation” was applied to the civil disorders with serious punishment after YongZheng reign. Until Qianlong reign, the legislations and cases which were adopted on “bare stick legislation” involved the crime of extortion, fraudulent, and rape. Generally, “bare stick legislation” had made historical influence on the offense of rogue in modern Criminal law in China.

Keywords

bare stick legislation、hooliganism、the servants of Manchu Eight Banners、Manchu feature、extortion

Cite

Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate.

Citation Text

Footnote
Dian-Jung Lee, “Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795),” Journal for Legal History Studies 26 (2014): 111-144.

Bibliography
Lee, Dian-Jung
2014 “Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795).” Journal for Legal History Studies 26: 111-144.
Lee, Dian-Jung. (2014). Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795). Journal for Legal History Studies, 26, 111-144.
Lee, Dian-Jung. “Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795).” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 26 (2014): 111-144.
Lee, Dian-Jung. “Stickman, Servant, and Hooligan: The Development about "Bare Stick" Legislation and the Influence of Manchu Bondservants in Qing (1644-1795).” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 26, 2014, pp. 111-144.
Copy

Export

Download Download Download Download
⟸ Back
返回頂端