メイン コンテンツ ブロック
メニュー
日本語

Asia Major

Discursive Paradigms for Relating the “Three Teachings” in China’s Period of Division    

摘要

In recent years, scholars have shown that the well-known rubric of the Three Teachings distorts the complex institutional, social, and even conceptual realities of medieval China’s religious landscape. Yet discourse relating, comparing, and contrasting commensurable (proto-) Teachings amenable to prospective translation as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism can be found extensively in documents surviving from the fourth century through the sixth. By tracking this discourse, this essay argues that discussions regarding the interrelationships between these (proto-) Teachings developed according to a dialectical series of shared structural paradigms partially detached from the facts on the ground. Eventually, these paradigms came to exert an influence on institutional, social, and conceptual history.

關鍵詞

interreligious debate, Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, religion and the state, pluralism, discursive paradigms

引用

引用書目為自動生成,僅便於讀者使用,
可能不完全準確。

引用文

脚注
Lucas Rambo Bender, “Discursive Paradigms for Relating the ‘Three Teachings’ in China’s Period of Division    ,” Asia Major 36 (2023): 1-46.

参考文献
Bender, Lucas Rambo
2023 “Discursive Paradigms for Relating the ‘Three Teachings’ in China’s Period of Division    .” Asia Major 36: 1-46.
Bender, Lucas Rambo. (2023). Discursive Paradigms for Relating the “Three Teachings” in China’s Period of Division    . Asia Major, 36, 1-46.
Bender, Lucas Rambo. “Discursive Paradigms for Relating the ‘Three Teachings’ in China’s Period of Division    .” Asia Major, no. 36 (2023): 1-46.
Bender, Lucas Rambo. “Discursive Paradigms for Relating the ‘Three Teachings’ in China’s Period of Division    .” Asia Major, no. 36, 2023, pp. 1-46.
コピー

輸出

ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード
⟸前のページ
このページの先頭へ