Abstract
This article introduces new evidence about an important, dramatic event in early Chinese history, namely the fall of the Western Zhou in 771 bc and the subsequent eastward relocation of the dynasty. The recently discovered bamboo manuscript, Xinian 繫年, now in the Tsinghua (Qinghua) University collection, presents a new account of the events, most notably the claim that for nine years (749–741 bc) there was no single king on the Zhou throne. This departs considerably from the traditional story preserved in Records of the Historian (Shiji 史記). Facing this contradiction, scholars have opted to reinterpret Xinian so as to make it conform to Shiji. The present authors analyze the Xinian version of events and its reliability; further, we explore the reasons for the disappearance of this version from the subsequent historiographic tradition. It is a point of departure that addresses a broad methodological problem: how to deal with ostensible contradictions between unearthed and transmitted texts.
Keywords
Zhou, historiography, manuscripts, Shiji, Sima Qian, Western Zhou, Xinian
Cite
Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate.
