中央研究院歷史語言研究所

法制史研究

近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案 The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View

作　　者：
李啟成 Li, Qi-Cheng
期別頁碼：
9：103-132
出版時間：
2006/06
引用全文下載

摘要

本文通過較深入的資料發掘，考證了曾經轟動一時後又被人遺忘的晚清彈劾軍機案，並將其置於整個近代中國憲政追求進程中，來分析該案的前因後果進而評判其價值，指出：晚清彈劾軍機案的發生和草草收場，與中國長期以來所存在的皇權專斷為特徵的權力運作有必然聯繫；在軍機案中，立憲原則已成為國家意識形態和權力運作的重要組成部分。這是近代中國憲政的一個亮點，也是近代中國立憲經驗累積的第一步。

The thesis made a textual research on the case of Impeach Privy Council in the Qing Dynasty by abundant material , analyzed cause and effect of the nine day’s wonder case, made a conclusion: the case ended hastily had an inevitable relation with China’s arbitrary imperial power. Constitutional principles had already been a crucial part of ideology and authority operate. The case was very important in modern China’s constitutional government.

關鍵詞

晚清、彈劾軍機案、憲政、資政院

late Qing Dynasty, impeach Privy Council, constitution, Zizheng parliament

引用

引用書目為自動生成，僅便於讀者使用，
可能不完全準確。

引用書目

註腳

李啟成，〈近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案〉，《法制史研究》9（2006）：103-132。

Qi-Cheng Li, “The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View,” Journal for Legal History Studies 9 (2006): 103-132.

書目

李啟成

2006　〈近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案〉，《法制史研究》9：103-132。

Li, Qi-Cheng

2006　“The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View.” Journal for Legal History Studies 9: 103-132.

李啟成. (2006). 近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案. 法制史研究, 9, 103-132.

Li, Qi-Cheng. (2006). The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View. Journal for Legal History Studies, 9, 103-132.

李啟成. “近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案.” 法制史研究, no. 9 (2006): 103-132.

Li, Qi-Cheng. “The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 9 (2006): 103-132.

李啟成. “近代憲政視野中的晚清彈劾軍機案.” 法制史研究, no. 9, 2006, pp. 103-132.

Li, Qi-Cheng. “The Impeachment of the Privy Council in the Late Qing Dynasty from a Modern Constitutional Point of View.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 9, 2006, pp. 103-132.

複製

匯出格式

下載下載下載下載

⟸回上頁