メイン コンテンツ ブロック
メニュー
日本語

法制史研究

民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法 Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts

  • 作  者:

    江照信 Jiang, Zhao-Xin

  • 期別頁碼:

    24:241-261

  • 出版時間:

    2013/12

  • 引用 ダウンロード

摘要

本文主要觀點在於,民國司法志實質是一部法律民族化運動史,清末以來的變法與轉型,寄於人物,首先表現為民族主義者各派所致力、凝聚、養成的法律民族化運動,由此可以理解法律的現代性問題。

This article mainly argues that the judicial history in Republican Era as a whole is in essence a time of legal nationalist movement. The legal
changes and transitions established in the Republican judicial system can’t be achieved without those judicial nationalists who chose to work hard
together for the legal transformation and acted in uniformity regardless of their ideological differences. Therefore, to understand the modernity issue
in China, we have to understand these committed judicial nationalists

關鍵詞

立憲派司法、辛亥派司法、法律民族化運動

Constitutionalist Court、Xinhai Revolutionary Court、Legal nationalist Movement

引用

引用書目為自動生成,僅便於讀者使用,
可能不完全準確。

引用文

脚注
江照信,〈民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法〉,《法制史研究》24(2013):241-261。
Zhao-Xin Jiang, “Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts,” Journal for Legal History Studies 24 (2013): 241-261.

参考文献
江照信
2013 〈民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法〉,《法制史研究》24:241-261。
Jiang, Zhao-Xin
2013 “Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts.” Journal for Legal History Studies 24: 241-261.
江照信. (2013). 民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法. 法制史研究, 24, 241-261.

Jiang, Zhao-Xin. (2013). Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts. Journal for Legal History Studies, 24, 241-261.
江照信. “民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法.” 法制史研究, no. 24 (2013): 241-261.

Jiang, Zhao-Xin. “Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 24 (2013): 241-261.
江照信. “民國沒有反沈派:立憲派司法與辛亥派司法.” 法制史研究, no. 24, 2013, pp. 241-261.

Jiang, Zhao-Xin. “Judicial Nationalists in ROC—The Constitutionalists and Xinhai Revolutionaries in Courts.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 24, 2013, pp. 241-261.
コピー

輸出

ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード
⟸前のページ
このページの先頭へ