摘要
三十年來的清代法律史，尤其是清代地方法律史，無論是資料的整理，還是論題的遴選、研究方法的運用都發生了顯著的變化。在史料上，學界逐漸從單一的典章制度轉向檔案、碑刻、族譜、契約文書等官方、民間文獻上，這些文獻尤其是清代州縣司法檔案的陸續開放與出版，更是引發了史料「革命」，不僅極大地拓寬了傳統法史的研究領域，推動了研究方法與進路的不斷創新，更打破了此前法律史研究的諸多侷限，研究的問題也由以前的宏觀、大而化之轉向微觀和具體。不過，整體而言，仍存在諸多遺憾。
Notable changes have taken place on the collation of data, selection of topics, and the use of research approaches of the legal history, especially
that of the local history in Qing Dynasty in the past three decades. Scholars have gradually shifted from the single perspective of institutions to official and folk data such as files, inscriptions, genealogy and contracts, and these documents, especially those of judicial files from Chous and Counties in Qing Dynasty which have been opened up and published successively, have triggered a historical data “revolution”, which has broadened the field of the traditional law history, promoted innovative research approaches, and broken many limitations of the previous researches, so that the topics have changed from the previous macro and general ones to the micro and specific ones. Overall, there are still a lot of regrets left.
關鍵詞
三十年、清代法律史、整理、研究
three decades、legal history in Qing Dynasty、collation、researches
