メイン コンテンツ ブロック
メニュー
日本語

法制史研究

作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想 A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought

摘要

王世杰是近代史上重要的法學家,他自巴黎大學學成回國後在北京大學任教,寫了一系列的學術論文討論近代代議制的改造問題,主要研究憲法學上的女子參政、職業代表制、比例代表制的發展趨勢。他還重法治的發展和個人自由的保障,對北洋時期的法律制度多有批判。此外,他運用所學的關於聯邦制的理論,分析其時的中國政局,以期為中國的發展貢獻智識之力。

Wang Shih-chieh was one of the most important legal scholars in modern China. He got the PH.D degree from the University of Paris and taught in the Peking University after returning home. He wrote a series of papers discussing the problem of transformation of modern representative system, including the development trend of women’s participation in politics, professional representative system and proportional representative system. He also paid attention to the development of the rule of law and guarantee of the individual freedom, criticized the legal system during Beiyang period. In addition, he applied the theory of the federal system to analyze China’s political situation. He expected to contribute to the development of China’s wisdom.

關鍵詞

王世杰、職業代表制、比例代表制、聯邦制、領事裁判

Wang Shih-chieh, professional representative system,
proportional representative system, federal system,
consular jurisdiction

引用

引用書目為自動生成,僅便於讀者使用,
可能不完全準確。

引用文

脚注
劉猛,〈作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想〉,《法制史研究》29(2016):273-310。
Meng Liu, “A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought,” Journal for Legal History Studies 29 (2016): 273-310.

参考文献
劉猛
2016 〈作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想〉,《法制史研究》29:273-310。
Liu, Meng
2016 “A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought.” Journal for Legal History Studies 29: 273-310.
劉猛. (2016). 作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想. 法制史研究, 29, 273-310.

Liu, Meng. (2016). A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought. Journal for Legal History Studies, 29, 273-310.
劉猛. “作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想.” 法制史研究, no. 29 (2016): 273-310.

Liu, Meng. “A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 29 (2016): 273-310.
劉猛. “作為法學家的王世杰 ──學術與思想.” 法制史研究, no. 29, 2016, pp. 273-310.

Liu, Meng. “A Legal Scholar: Wang Shih-chieh’s Academic Thought.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 29, 2016, pp. 273-310.
コピー

輸出

ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード
⟸前のページ
このページの先頭へ