メイン コンテンツ ブロック
メニュー
日本語

法制史研究

日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心 Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria

  • 作  者:

    鄭政誠 Cheng, Cheng-Chen

  • 期別頁碼:

    13:209-232

  • 出版時間:

    2008/06

  • 引用 ダウンロード

摘要

由於人種、語言、法律及風俗習慣的差異,日人據台之初面臨各種統治的困難與不便,有鑑於此,台灣總督府遂於明治三十四年(1901)四月成立「臨時台灣舊慣調查會」,以文獻搜集、耆老訪談、實地調查與海外考察等法,進行各種舊慣調查,藉以瞭解台灣風土民情並希能有效立法。雖然立法課題最終宣告失敗,然該會在進行調查時所完成之各種調查報告書,爾後卻成為研究台海兩岸法制、經濟與族群史之第一手材料,學術價值頗高。 而隨明治三十八年日俄戰爭的勝利,日本佔據中國東北後,亦由於人種、語言、法律、風俗習慣的差異,尤其是複雜的土地關係制度,讓日人深感侷促。為此,日人乃於明治四十年四月,在主掌滿洲事務經營之「南滿洲鐵道株式會社」下設立「舊慣調查班」以專事負責。雖然該調查班在營運八年中(1907-1915)僅完成七種九冊有關土地關係之《滿洲舊慣調查報告》,然其價值卻如同台灣舊慣調查會出版之各類調查報告書,成為研究滿洲地區之重要學術資料。由於統籌台灣與滿洲舊慣調查的主要人物皆為後藤新平,且滿洲調查正是後藤在卸任臨時台灣舊慣調查會會長後之所為,故台灣舊慣的調查經驗、模式、人員與方針,可說相當程度移植到滿洲舊慣調查。從台灣與滿洲二地的舊慣調查中,除可看出日人在統治政策的相承性外,由於舊慣調查多呈學術意涵,亦可揭示日本國策與學術結合之重要意義。

 

 

Because of the various differences between Taiwan and Japan, the latter faced the serious problems when they occupied in Taiwan. In dealing with many kinds of traditional customs problems and legislation , The Taiwan Governors Office(台灣總督府)founded the Provisional Investigation Committee on Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs”(臨時台灣舊慣調查會), adopted the methods of historiography, oral history, and field investigation to carry out. Although the legislation can not work finally, but the huge volumes reports made by that committee, greatly help researching Ch’ing dynasty and Taiwan law system, economics, and aborigines in the early 20th century.

Like the problems in Taiwan, when Japan controlledManchuria, they faced the same questions in traditional customs,especially in the land system. Japan set up the “Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation Team”(舊慣調查班)under South Manchuria Railways Company”(南滿洲鐵道株式會社), the Manchuria agency of Japan empire, and asked for that was responsible for traditional customs investigation. After eight years, it finished the affairs and handed in nine volumes reports, the value of those as the publications for Taiwan provisional investigation committee, became the important materials for studying Manchuria later.

Goto Shinpei(後藤新平), the important figure on Japan empire, was the chairman no matter in Taiwan or Manchuria traditional customs investigating organization. He hired the staff and used inspection way on Taiwan traditional customs first and transferred them to Manchuria. Following the direction, we can find the connection between two institutions, meanings of academic created by them, and combination for academic and empire policy as well.

關鍵詞

滿洲舊慣調查報告、舊慣調查班、臨時台灣舊慣調查會、後藤新平、岡松參太郎

Reports of Manchuria Traditional Manners and CustomsTraditional Manners and Customs Investigation TeamProvisional Investigation Committee on Taiwan Traditional Manners and CustomsGoto ShinpeiOkamatsu Santarou

引用

引用書目為自動生成,僅便於讀者使用,
可能不完全準確。

引用文

脚注
鄭政誠,〈日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心〉,《法制史研究》13(2008):209-232。
Cheng-Chen Cheng, “Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria,” Journal for Legal History Studies 13 (2008): 209-232.

参考文献
鄭政誠
2008 〈日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心〉,《法制史研究》13:209-232。
Cheng, Cheng-Chen
2008 “Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria.” Journal for Legal History Studies 13: 209-232.
鄭政誠. (2008). 日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心. 法制史研究, 13, 209-232.

Cheng, Cheng-Chen. (2008). Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria. Journal for Legal History Studies, 13, 209-232.
鄭政誠. “日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心.” 法制史研究, no. 13 (2008): 209-232.

Cheng, Cheng-Chen. “Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 13 (2008): 209-232.
鄭政誠. “日治時期台灣舊慣調查對滿洲舊慣調查的輸出──以調查模式與人員的移植為中心.” 法制史研究, no. 13, 2008, pp. 209-232.

Cheng, Cheng-Chen. “Copy the Investigation: The Contribution of Taiwan Traditional Manners and Customs Investigation in Manchuria.” Journal for Legal History Studies, no. 13, 2008, pp. 209-232.
コピー

輸出

ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード ダウンロード
⟸前のページ
このページの先頭へ